Hares Progress
$53.17 won (2.66% of goal)
$2000 –
$1800 –
$1600 –
$1400 –
$1200 –
$1000 –
$800 –
$600 –
$400 –
$200 –
$0 –
NCAA Betting Analysis
Clever Hares Team Performance Report – March 8, 2024
Team Performance Snapshot
Win Rate
66.7%
For consensus games
Net Profit
$40.47
From consensus games
ROI
27%
Return on investment
Consensus Games
6
Games with 2+ bets
Individual Player Performance
The Risk Wrangler
Win Rate
100.0%
Bets
4
Avg Bet
$37.50
Profit
$135.70
ROI
90%
The Chaser
Win Rate
66.7%
Bets
6
Avg Bet
$25.00
Profit
$40.47
ROI
27%
The Oracle
Win Rate
60.0%
Bets
5
Avg Bet
$30.00
Profit
$19.48
ROI
13%
The Wildcard
Win Rate
57.1%
Bets
7
Avg Bet
$21.43
Profit
$13.26
ROI
9%
Consensus Games Analysis
| Game | Spread | Type | Odds | Consensus | Outcome | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. John’s (6) | 1.5 | Underdog | -112 | 4 | Win | $22.32 |
| Duke (2) | -11.5 | Favorite | -118 | 4 | Win | $21.19 |
| Kentucky (19) | 4.5 | Underdog | -108 | 3 | Win | $23.15 |
| Alabama (7) | 8.5 | Underdog | -105 | 3 | Win | $23.81 |
| Wisconsin (12) | -12.5 | Favorite | -115 | 2 | Loss | -$25.00 |
| Houston (3) | -4.5 | Favorite | -105 | 2 | Loss | -$25.00 |
Betting Strategy Analysis
Point Spread Performance
| Spread Category | Games | Win Rate | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small (< 5) | 3 | 66.7% | $20.47 |
| Medium (5-9.9) | 1 | 100.0% | $23.81 |
| Large (≥ 10) | 2 | 50.0% | -$3.81 |
Favorite vs Underdog Performance
| Type | Games | Win Rate | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Favorite | 3 | 33.3% | -$28.81 |
| Underdog | 3 | 100.0% | $69.28 |
Key Insights
- Consensus Strength: Higher consensus correlates with better performance. All 4-player consensus bets won, while all 2-player consensus bets lost.
- Underdog Advantage: Underdogs showed exceptional performance with a perfect 3-0 record and $69.28 profit.
- Betting Strategy: The Risk Wrangler’s selective approach (fewer games, higher bets) yielded the best results with perfect accuracy and highest profit.
- Medium Spreads: Bets on medium spread games (5-9.9 points) performed best, though with limited sample size.
- Team ROI: The team achieved a solid 27% return on investment for consensus games.
Betting Results – February 22, 2025
| Choice | Point Spread | Odds | Results | The Hares – Straight Bet Win/Loss | The Hares – Confidence Bet Win/Loss | Chaser Betting Win/Loss | Risk Wrangler Win/Loss Amount | Oracle Confidence | The Wildcard Win/Loss Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at Wisconsin (11) | -7.5 | -105 | L | -20.00 | -27.00 | -16.67 | -14.29 | -16.67 | ||
| at Duke (3) | -10.5 | -108 | W | 18.52 | 18.52 | 13.23 | 15.44 | 13.23 | ||
| Clemson (18) | -2.5 | -125 | W | 16.00 | 20.00 | 11.43 | 13.34 | 11.43 | ||
| Florida State | 13.5 | -110 | W | 18.18 | 10.00 | 15.15 | 15.15 | |||
| Oklahoma State | 14.5 | -112 | L | -20.00 | -17.00 | -14.29 | -16.67 | |||
| Iowa State (8) | 7.5 | -110 | L | -14.29 | -16.67 | |||||
| Kentucky (17) | 7.5 | -110 | L | -14.29 | -14.29 | |||||
| Tennessee (6) | -2.5 | -110 | W | 12.99 | ||||||
| at Oklahoma | 1.5 | -110 | W | 15.15 | ||||||
| at Texas Tech (9) | -12.5 | -110 | W | 12.99 | ||||||
| at Houston (5) | -7.5 | -110 | W | 15.15 | ||||||
| at Vanderbilt | -1.5 | -110 | W | 12.99 | ||||||
| at Alabama (4) | -7.5 | -110 | W | 15.15 | ||||||
| at Arizona (19) | -7.5 | -110 | L | -16.67 | ||||||
| at Arkansas | 2.5 | -110 | W | 12.99 | ||||||
| Florida (2) | -9.5 | -110 | W | 12.99 | ||||||
| Total Bets/Net Win (Loss) | 12.70 | 4.52 | 62.34 | 57.56 | (19.51) | (36.37) | ||||
| Winning Percentage | 60.00% | 60.00% | 85.71% | 83.33% | 42.86% | 33.33% |
